Diebold’s response to the Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy’s demonstration of security breeches of Diebold voting machines was that the attack was against an older generation machine which is no longer in use and would not be effective against the current generation of their product. The New York Times now reports that Diebold refuses to send an example of their new voting machine to Princeton to back this claim up.
Welcome
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- America
- Art
- Culture War
- Dogs
- Economics
- Environment
- Gadgets
- Government
- Guns and Shooting
- Health Care
- History
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islam
- Law
- Military
- Nature
- News of the Weird
- Notable Structures
- Now Reading
- Philosophy
- Playtime
- Politics
- Quotes
- Religion
- Science
- Technology
- This is CNN / the MSM
- Uncategorized
- Unintended Consequences
- United Nations
Blogroll
- Ace of Spades
- andrew davis web
- Armed and Dangerous
- Code is Free Speech
- Cold Fury
- Colion Noir
- DefCad
- Defense Distributed
- Don Surber
- Firearms Policy Coalition
- John Cox
- Jordan Peterson's Web Page
- keepandbeararms.com
- Law Dog
- Michael Yon
- Monster Hunter Nation
- Power Line
- Prager Univerity
- Quietly Armed
- Sarah Carter
- Sharyl Attkinson
- Sultan Knish
- The Last Refuge
- The Old School Patriot
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Watts Up With That
- Yer Ol' Woodpile Report
Links
Categories